Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220
Original file (BC 2013 03220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03220

	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 
16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force 
Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a pre-existing medical condition that precluded him from 
obtaining overall satisfactory ratings on the contested FAs.
  
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits two “Medical 
Condition Determination” letters signed by his medical provider 
on 15 Oct 12 and 25 Feb 13, indicating he “had a documented 
medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing 
score in a non-exempt portion” of the contested FAs.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of Staff Sergeant (E-5).

On 29 Oct 10, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an 
overall composite score of 34.75, which constituted an 
“unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with 
the following component scores:  Cardio – Exempt, Abdominal 
Circumference – 43.00”/1.90 points, Push-ups – 31/6.50, Sit-ups 
– 37/5.50.

On 28 Oct 11, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an 
overall composite score of 71.33, which constituted an 
“unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with 
the following component scores:  Cardio – 39/42.30, Abdominal 
Circumference – 37.50”/15.10 points, Push-ups – 33/6.80, Sit-ups 
– Exempt.

On 16 Nov 12, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an 
overall composite score of 68.00, which constituted an 
“unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with 
the following component scores:  Cardio – 38/39.30, Abdominal 
Circumference – 37.50”/15.10 points, Push-ups – 33/6.80, Sit-ups 
– Exempt.

On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the 
Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “The applicant 
had a pre-existing injury that was validated by medical, but the 
AF Form 108 did not indicate what the medical injury was. Also, 
there was no evidence the commander wanted to invalidate the 
Fitness Assessment.”

Examiner’s Note: The FAAB references an AF Form 108, Physical 
Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, as documentation 
of the applicant’s medical condition.  However, the initial 
package (not including the applicants rebuttal) submitted to the 
BCMR does not include an AF Form 108, instead the applicant 
provides the two “Medical Condition Determination” letters 
referenced above in the applicant’s contentions.

_______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
change the contested FA in AFFMS due to the lack of supporting 
evidence.  

DPSIM references AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program (dated 1 Jul 10) 
AFGM 2.1(dated 26 Jun 12) Paragraph 10: "If an Airman becomes 
injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all 
required components, he/she will have the option of being 
evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her 
test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit 
Commander". The applicant did not provide any medical 
documentation stating there was a condition present that 
precluded him from passing the contested FAs. Additionally, he 
did not provide an invalidation memorandum from his Commander 
requesting the contested FAs be removed from the AFFMS.

Examiners Note: AFPC/DPSIM states the applicant did not take an 
FA on 20 Oct 11; however, this was a typo in the DD Form 149.  
The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force 
Evaluation that the FA he is contesting was dated 28 Oct 11.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, 
is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________




APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In response to the FAAB’s statement, “the AF Form 108 did not 
indicate what the medical injury was” he explains the lack of 
detail on the AF Form 108 is due to a lack of guidance and 
knowledge on the process by him and his chain-of-command.  
Furthermore, he contends that in his initial submission he 
provided two different “Medical Condition Determination” letters 
from his medical provider in the format provided by AFI 36-2905.  
However, the format of the memorandum does not indicate that the 
medical provider needs to explain the diagnosis; just that he 
had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 
contested FAs. 

In further support of his appeal, the applicant provides a 
letter from his commander requesting the contested FAs be 
removed from AFFMS, two AF Forms 108 that show medical 
documentation was not recorded on the AF Form 108s; and a 
resubmission of the two “Medical Condition Determination” 
letters that he provided in his original submission. 

A complete copy of the applicant’s response is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we believe he has met his burden of 
establishing the contested FAs should be declared void.  In this 
respect, we note that in response to the Air Force evaluation, 
the applicant submits a letter from his commander requesting the 
contested FAs be removed.  In view of this and noting the 
“Medical Determination Letters” from his medical provider, we 
find a sufficient basis to recommend favorable consideration of 
this request. Therefore, based on the foregoing, we recommend 
the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________

?
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the 
Fitness Assessments, dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 
be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness 
Management System.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-03220 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 Jun 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 30 Dec 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 31 Mar 14, w/atchs.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04468

    Original file (BC 2013 04468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finally, the applicant did not provide any additional supporting documentation to consider, i.e., commander’s invalidation, AF Form 422, etc.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void and remove the FAs dated 22 Feb 11, 1 Mar 11, and 22 Jun 11. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM and AFPC/DPSIDE evaluations is at Exhibit B and Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04717

    Original file (BC 2013 04717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A list of the applicant’s last 5 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating *22 Jul 13 18.88 35/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Mar 13 59.63 38/47.70 Unsatisfactory 10 Sep 12 79.78 39/49.80 Satisfactory 24 Feb 12 78.33 41/47.20 Satisfactory 19 Aug 11 86.00 44/52.40 Satisfactory *Contested FA An AF Form 108, dated 4 Sep 13, signed by his medical provider, states “the member has been evaluated and has a medical condition precluding the achievement of a passing score.” On 20 Feb 14, a similar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235

    Original file (BC 2013 03235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04441

    Original file (BC 2013 04441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “there was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicant’s medical provider.” A list of the applicant’s last 10 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 5 Feb 14 82.00 Exempt Satisfactory 19 Jun 13 79.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Feb 13 85.00 Exempt Satisfactory *27 Dec 12 23.50 39/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Jun...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682

    Original file (BC 2013 04682.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of “no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02738

    Original file (BC 2013 02738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result we have concluded that the recorded AC scores are not an accurate reflection of applicant's abdominal circumference. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days. The applicant has provided documentation validating he had a medical condition that affected his ability to pass the AC...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01762

    Original file (BC 2013 01762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence to support contention.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01360

    Original file (BC 2013 01360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence to support contention.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03517

    Original file (BC 2013 03517 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She sent medical documentation to her medical unit prior to the contested FA that should have exempted her from components of the assessment. On 19 Apr 13, the applicant provided a “Fitness Screening Questionnaire Memorandum for Medical Clearance” signed by her medical provider and indicating that she was medically cleared to test on the cardio component (1-mile walk test) and the abdominal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04714

    Original file (BC 2013 04714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provided a memorandum from the medical provider dated 01 Jul 13, that validated he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 19 Jun 13 FA and then was issued an AF Form 469. In regards to the FA dated 19 Jun 13, we recognize the letter from his medical provider, which states that a medical condition prevented him from passing. Furthermore, the applicant contends that since the FAs dated 31 July 12 and 28 Dec 12 now reflect a passing score in AFFMS and the FAs...